Gov. Rick Scott may shift stance on health reform law




















With the reelection of President Barack Obama, Florida’s Republican leaders are reconsidering their fervent opposition to federal healthcare reform, triggering a discussion that could have huge repercussions for South Florida.

At stake is more than $6 billion in federal funding for Miami-Dade and Broward over the next decade and the possibility of health insurance for a large percentage of the 1.4 million people in the two counties who now lack coverage.

After the defeat of Mitt Romney, who vowed to halt Obama’s healthcare overhaul, the Republican leaders of the Florida House and Senate quickly said the Legislature needed to reexamine the federal act. On Friday evening, Gov. Rick Scott said he agreed there needed to be a discussion.





“Just saying ‘no’ is not an answer,” Scott said in a statement that repeated exactly what Sen. Don Gaetz, R-Destin, the incoming Senate president, told The Miami Herald on Thursday.

“I don’t like this law,” Gaetz also said, “but this is the law, and I believe I have a constitutional obligation to carry it out.” He added that he thinks “there needs to be some adult debate between Republicans and Democrats” on finding ways to make the law work.

Still, Gaetz, Scott and others in the Republican leadership, which controls both the Florida House and Senate, have many criticisms of what both parties now call “Obamacare.” Some are searching for compromises on how it is carried out in the state. What this means for patients and the healthcare industry in Florida — particularly South Florida — remains an enormous question mark.

Time is running short for decisions as the once-distant consequences of the Affordable Care Act are scheduled to kick in during the next 14 months.

The first deadline is Friday. That’s when states must tell Washington whether they plan to set up exchanges — marketplaces where individuals can purchase insurance at discounted group rates and cannot be denied because of pre-existing conditions.

Florida’s political leaders acknowledge they won’t make the deadline. The exchanges are scheduled to start Jan. 1, 2014, and if a state doesn’t set up an exchange, its residents can participate in a federal exchange.

The next provision starts Jan. 1 with an increase in Medicaid fees for primary care physicians. Primary care physicians, who have long complained about low rates for Medicaid, which provides coverage for the poor, are scheduled to be paid at considerably higher Medicare rates — with the feds picking up all of the added cost. But such a pay hike can only happen with the approval of the governor and Legislature, and it’s unclear whether that will happen.

The following year, on Jan. 1, 2014, the biggest changes are slated to start, including a major expansion of people covered by Medicaid. An analysis from the Safety Net Hospital Alliance of Florida shows that if the state doesn’t expand coverage, Florida will lose $27.9 billion in federal funds over 10 years.

That breaks down to a $4.5 billion loss for Miami-Dade during that time, and a $2.3 billion loss for Broward, according to the alliance’s analysis.

Under the law, Washington will pay all Medicaid expansion costs for the first three years, but then the states would have to pay up to 10 percent of the costs in following years — an expense that the Safety Net Alliance calculates will come to $1.7 billion over 10 years in Florida. The expansion could provide coverage to an additional million-plus Floridians. Reform supporters say the expansion would provide cheaper basic care that would help prevent serious illnesses that lead to expensive hospital stays.





Read More..

‘Super’ market








What’s keeping the markets up in a down economy?

The “super rich,” according to a battery of new studies, as they find that stocks are the best investment in a time of low interest rates.

“The ultra-wealthy are looking for yield, and right now the average yield of a S&P 500 stock is over twice the average on a two-year CD,” financial adviser Ron Weiner told The Post.

“If you are just looking for some kind of dividend that pays more that a fixed-income CD, that search would drive you into buying relatively conservative stocks,” added Weiner, founder and CEO of RDM Financial Group.




“There are plenty of these kind of stocks in traditional, safe-yielding companies like AT&T, Johnson & Johnson and IBM,” he said.

The charge of the 1 percenters into equities has buoyed the anemic US equities markets, even as the New York Stock Exchange and others have seen lower and lower trading volumes.

Analysts calculate that the wealthiest 1 percent of American investors account for more than 50 percent of individually held stocks in the US.

But the average middle-class investor isn’t along for the ride. Except for exposure in 401(k)s, lower-income investors have fled the market in droves.

“No question, the middle class is getting pinched in their cash flow,” Weiner said. Any extra income usually goes not to day-trading but paying down debt.

The return of the super-rich to stocks might explain why an explosive equities market may be around the corner. Stock funds saw net outflows of $1.73 billion in the week ended Oct. 17, according to the latest report from the Investment Company Institute. That was the smallest withdrawal out of funds in 13 weeks. The previous week had outflows of $2.61 billion.

A UBS Wealth Management Americas (WMA) survey last week of individual investors — those with a minimum $250,000 in investable assets each; half having at least $1 million — confirms this sudden change.

The UBS survey showed that 35 percent of its US private clients are more optimistic about the 12-month economic outlook compared with 21 percent a year ago. With average cash holdings comprising about 20 percent of their portfolios, many respondents felt they had too much money in cash. Among high net-worth investors, 28 percent feel that way today compared with 18 percent a year ago. For less wealthy, but still affluent, investors, it’s 17 percent today versus 13 percent a year ago.

Another study, by Spectrem Group, of individuals worth at least a $25 million (excluding primary residence) also underscores the trend among super-rich investors.

These respondents typically own $7 million in stocks. A substantial proportion, 62 percent, are ready to invest in equities in the next year. In contrast, 38 percent planned to invest in fixed income, 19 percent in Treasuries and 26 percent in hedge funds.

“Clearly, middle-class investors are not in the stock market to the same extent as the very rich,” said Alois Pirker, an analyst at Aite Group.










Read More..

Gov. Rick Scott may shift stance on health reform law




















With the reelection of President Barack Obama, Florida’s Republican leaders are reconsidering their fervent opposition to federal healthcare reform, triggering a discussion that could have huge repercussions for South Florida.

At stake is more than $6 billion in federal funding for Miami-Dade and Broward over the next decade and the possibility of health insurance for a large percentage of the 1.4 million people in the two counties who now lack coverage.

After the defeat of Mitt Romney, who vowed to halt Obama’s healthcare overhaul, the Republican leaders of the Florida House and Senate quickly said the Legislature needed to reexamine the federal act. On Friday evening, Gov. Rick Scott said he agreed there needed to be a discussion.





“Just saying ‘no’ is not an answer,” Scott said in a statement that repeated exactly what Sen. Don Gaetz, R-Destin, the incoming Senate president, told The Miami Herald on Thursday.

“I don’t like this law,” Gaetz also said, “but this is the law, and I believe I have a constitutional obligation to carry it out.” He added that he thinks “there needs to be some adult debate between Republicans and Democrats” on finding ways to make the law work.

Still, Gaetz, Scott and others in the Republican leadership, which controls both the Florida House and Senate, have many criticisms of what both parties now call “Obamacare.” Some are searching for compromises on how it is carried out in the state. What this means for patients and the healthcare industry in Florida — particularly South Florida — remains an enormous question mark.

Time is running short for decisions as the once-distant consequences of the Affordable Care Act are scheduled to kick in during the next 14 months.

The first deadline is Friday. That’s when states must tell Washington whether they plan to set up exchanges — marketplaces where individuals can purchase insurance at discounted group rates and cannot be denied because of pre-existing conditions.

Florida’s political leaders acknowledge they won’t make the deadline. The exchanges are scheduled to start Jan. 1, 2014, and if a state doesn’t set up an exchange, its residents can participate in a federal exchange.

The next provision starts Jan. 1 with an increase in Medicaid fees for primary care physicians. Primary care physicians, who have long complained about low rates for Medicaid, which provides coverage for the poor, are scheduled to be paid at considerably higher Medicare rates — with the feds picking up all of the added cost. But such a pay hike can only happen with the approval of the governor and Legislature, and it’s unclear whether that will happen.

The following year, on Jan. 1, 2014, the biggest changes are slated to start, including a major expansion of people covered by Medicaid. An analysis from the Safety Net Hospital Alliance of Florida shows that if the state doesn’t expand coverage, Florida will lose $27.9 billion in federal funds over 10 years.

That breaks down to a $4.5 billion loss for Miami-Dade during that time, and a $2.3 billion loss for Broward, according to the alliance’s analysis.

Under the law, Washington will pay all Medicaid expansion costs for the first three years, but then the states would have to pay up to 10 percent of the costs in following years — an expense that the Safety Net Alliance calculates will come to $1.7 billion over 10 years in Florida. The expansion could provide coverage to an additional million-plus Floridians. Reform supporters say the expansion would provide cheaper basic care that would help prevent serious illnesses that lead to expensive hospital stays.





Read More..

Weather alert: Weekend will be cool and breezy




















Cool weather will continue Saturday in South Florida with breezy conditions and low temperatures dipping below 70. Highs will be in the mid-70s.

On Sunday, forecasters expect the start of a warming trend, with highs near 80 and a low of about 70.

Monday will bring more breezes and partly sunny skies, with a high of 79 degrees and a 20 percent chance of rain after 8 a.m.





For up-to-date forecasts and maps, click here.





Read More..

Spotify to raise $100 million at $3 billion valuation – report
















(Reuters) – Spotify is in the middle of a $ 100 million financing round that could value the music streaming company at just over $ 3 billion, the Wall Street Journal reported citing sources.


The Journal said Spotify would raise the fresh capital from multiple investors including Goldman Sachs. The WSJ report did not name any other investors.













Spotify has raised capital from outside investors several times since it set up shop in 2006, and was earlier reported to have been looking to secure a capital boost of about $ 200 million, at a valuation of about $ 4 billion.


Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, Accel Partners and others have invested about $ 189 million in the company in its prior financing rounds.


The company has over 15 million active users and 4 million paying subscribers, for its on-demand service, which offers unlimited music streaming of some 18 million tracks.


(Reporting by Himank Sharma in Bangalore)


Internet News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..

Mitt’s enduring gifts








Even before the Republican Party’s convention had gaveled to order last August, The Washington Post was pronouncing Mitt Romney at best “a transitional figure, rather than a transformative one” within the GOP. That he has since lost the election, and in so doing ceded to President Obama virtually all the battleground states, will do nothing to disturb this assessment. But it would be wrong to see Romney’s failed candidacy as a total loss for Republicans, or for the country.

For all Romney’s limitations as a candidate — his interpersonal awkwardness and propensity for gaffes, his reported preference for data over people and his elasticity on key issues — the man did some things that the Republican Party establishment that embraced him, and the conservative core that never quite did, should both regard, in retrospect, as real gifts.




One was the selection of Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) as his running mate. There are some prominent conservative writers, such as Newsmax CEO Christopher Ruddy, who are already pointing to the tapping of Ryan — the most important decision of Romney’s campaign — as a major mistake, one that “telegraphed his lack of political wisdom.”

Yet in selecting a young, savvy lawmaker who had established himself as the GOP’s driving intellectual force on a major issue, Romney discharged honorably one of the chief duties of the standard-bearer: using the ticket to nurture younger talent, and help the party contest elections well beyond one’s own.

Dwight Eisenhower did this with Richard Nixon; President Obama, with Joe Biden, did not.

The greater gift, however, was Romney’s first debate performance. Never mind that this proved the only buoy for the Romney campaign in the frightfully choppy waters of 2012, and thereby made the election, in its final weeks, a lot more interesting.

The fact is that, with his stellar command of various economic models, Romney in Denver on Oct. 3 delivered the greatest defense of capitalism and free markets that an audience of this size — 67.2 million people — has ever heard. It should be required viewing at business schools for the next 50 years.

With a fluency that eluded Obama, Romney proselytized for growth, trumpeting the benefits of smaller government, lower taxes and enhanced competition.

“The problem with raising taxes is that it slows down the rate of growth,” Romney declared. “More people working, getting higher pay, paying more taxes — that’s how we get growth and how we balance the budget.”

When the subject was health care, Romney again rose to the defense of the free market: “I’d just as soon not have the government telling me what kind of health care I get. I’d rather be able to have an insurance company — if I don’t like them, I can get rid of them and find a different insurance company.”

To this impassioned talk of choice and competition, the American electorate responded with unmistakable enthusiasm, the vast majority agreeing that Romney had won the debate. His electoral fortunes improved correspondingly, if only fleetingly; would, for his own sake, that Romney had maintained this level of excellence in the second two debates.

But who else in modern politics could have turned in such a performance on this issue at all?

One finds it hard to imagine Ronald Reagan, as gifted a communicator as he was, displaying the same fluency, the same command of economics, across 90 minutes of live television; Milton Friedman never faced an audience of 70 million.

This, then, was Mitt Romney’s enduring bequeathal to the Republican Party and the American people. He may yet find new venues in which to give more of himself and amass further successes, of one kind or another, to celebrate.

But even if not, this most gracious of losing candidates will still have performed, on behalf of all champions of our wondrous economic system, a service for which he deserves Americans’ enduring gratitude.

James Rosen is Fox News’ chief Washington correspondent and author of
“The Strong Man: John Mitchell and the Secrets of Watergate.



Have a comment on this PostOpinion column? Send it in to LETTERS@NYPOST.COM!










Read More..

American Airlines growing in Miami




















American Airlines says November is bringing a record schedule at Miami International Airport.

The airline along with regional carrier American Eagle will serve 114 destinations with 328 flights a day starting later this month. The newest routes are between Miami and Asuncion, Paraguay, which starts Thursday, and Miami and Roatán, Honduras, starting Nov. 17.

American is also increasing the frequency of flights to 38 cities.





American Eagle will transition to a fleet of 50-seat regional jets, doing away with turbo prop planes.

Although American is restructuring under bankruptcy protection, the airline has said long-term plans call for 20 percent growth at its five major hubs, including Miami.





Read More..